 |
 |
Geforce GTX 760 vs Geforce GTX 770
Intro
The Geforce GTX 760 features core clock speeds of 980 MHz on the GPU, and 1502 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 TAUs and 32 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Geforce GTX 770, which has a core clock frequency of 1046 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1753 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 1536 SPUs, 128 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.
Benchmarks
These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
7854 points |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
5923 points |
|
|
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
14 Mh/s |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
13 Mh/s |
|
|
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
170 Watts |
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
230 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
In theory, the Geforce GTX 770 should perform a small bit faster than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)
| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
224384 MB/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
192256 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Geforce GTX 770 should be a lot (more or less 42%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
133888 Mtexels/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
94080 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the Geforce GTX 770 is a better choice, though not by far. (explain)| Geforce GTX 770 |
|
33472 Mpixels/sec |
| Geforce GTX 760 |
|
31360 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Geforce GTX 760Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Geforce GTX 770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Geforce GTX 760 | Geforce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | June 2013 | May 2013 |
| Code Name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Memory | 2048 MB | 2048 MB |
| Core Speed | 980 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 6008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 170 watts | 230 watts |
| Bandwidth | 192256 MB/sec | 224384 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 94080 Mtexels/sec | 133888 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 31360 Mpixels/sec | 33472 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 1152 | 1536 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 96 | 128 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 3540 million | 3540 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.0 | DirectX 11.0 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.3 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It's calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.
Geforce GTX 760Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Geforce GTX 770Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
3 Responses to “Geforce GTX 760 vs Geforce GTX 770”thanks so much for this information.....
Wow, the GTX770 almost isn't worth the extra price.
Both my GTX760's is currently at 1,294mhz core and 1732mhz mem (6928mhz effective). Though my primay 760 will do 1840mhz (Elpida) (7360mhz effective).
770 has more cuda cores. Really the price to performance just isn't there, same with power. Kinda glad I didn't buy the 770.
The 760 vs 770 isn;'t really worth it, but the 770 vs 780, its bigger jump, so it looks a bit more appealing.
Not a big difference you say? almost double the fps on every game with my 770 compared to my 760. People may want to consider the 970s now but I still prefer a 780