Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 6790

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm makes use of a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this specific card. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 6790, which has a clock frequency of 840 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1050 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It is made up of 800 SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6790 150 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 171 Watts
Difference: 21 Watts (14%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon HD 6790 should theoretically be a small bit superior to the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6790 134400 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 22512 (20%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm will be quite a bit (more or less 23%) better at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 6790. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 6790 33600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 7872 (23%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm is a better choice, not by a very large margin though. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6790 13440 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2688 (20%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6790

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon HD 6790
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year December 22, 2008 April 2011
Code Name G200b Barts LE
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 840 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 134400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 33600 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 13440 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 800
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1700 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.1 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6790

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield