Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Crucial MX200 250MB vs SanDisk X400 512GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


X400 512GB 512 GB
MX200 250MB 250 GB
Difference: 262 (105%)

Random Read

MX200 250MB 100000 IOPS
X400 512GB 93500 IOPS
Difference: 6500 (7%)

Random Write

MX200 250MB 87000 IOPS
X400 512GB 75000 IOPS
Difference: 12000 (16%)

Sequential Read

MX200 250MB 555 MB/sec
X400 512GB 540 MB/sec
Difference: 15 (3%)

Sequential Write

X400 512GB 520 MB/sec
MX200 250MB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 20 (4%)


X400 512GB 160 TB
MX200 250MB 80 TB
Difference: 80 (100%)


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model MX200 250MB X400 512GB
Manufacturer Crucial SanDisk
NAND Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC TLC NAND
Form Factor 2.5" 2.5"
Capacity 250 GB 512 GB
Cache 512 MB (N/A) MB
Sequential Read 555 MB/s 540 MB/s
Sequential Write 500 MB/s 520 MB/s
Random Read 100000 IOPS 93500 IOPS
Random Write 87000 IOPS 75000 IOPS
Interface SATA III 6Gb/s SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Marvell 88SS9189 Marvell 88SS1074
Date Released 2015 2016
Endurance 80 TB 160 TB
Notes TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive) Warranty 5 years

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

MX200 250MB

Check prices at:

X400 512GB

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.