 |
 |
Compare any two Solid State Drives:
Crucial MX200 250MB vs SanDisk X400 512GB
Display Graphs
Specification Charts
Capacity
| X400 512GB |
|
512 GB |
| MX200 250MB |
|
250 GB |
|
|
Random Read
| MX200 250MB |
|
100000 IOPS |
| X400 512GB |
|
93500 IOPS |
|
|
Random Write
| MX200 250MB |
|
87000 IOPS |
| X400 512GB |
|
75000 IOPS |
|
|
Sequential Read
| MX200 250MB |
|
555 MB/sec |
| X400 512GB |
|
540 MB/sec |
|
|
Sequential Write
| X400 512GB |
|
520 MB/sec |
| MX200 250MB |
|
500 MB/sec |
|
|
Endurance
| X400 512GB |
|
160 TB |
| MX200 250MB |
|
80 TB |
|
|
Specifications
Display Specifications
| Model | MX200 250MB | X400 512GB |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Crucial | SanDisk |
| NAND | Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC | TLC NAND |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | 2.5" |
| Capacity | 250 GB | 512 GB |
| Cache | 512 MB | (N/A) MB |
| Sequential Read | 555 MB/s | 540 MB/s |
| Sequential Write | 500 MB/s | 520 MB/s |
| Random Read | 100000 IOPS | 93500 IOPS |
| Random Write | 87000 IOPS | 75000 IOPS |
| Interface | SATA III 6Gb/s | SATA III 6Gb/s |
| Controller | Marvell 88SS9189 | Marvell 88SS1074 |
| Date Released | 2015 | 2016 |
| Endurance | 80 TB | 160 TB |
| Notes | TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive) | Warranty 5 years |
Price Comparison
Display Prices
MX200 250MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
X400 512GBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
