Compare any two Solid State Drives:


Kingston HyperX Savage 240GB vs Crucial MX200 500MB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts


MX200 500MB 500 GB
HyperX Savage 240GB 240 GB
Difference: 260 (108%)

Random Read

HyperX Savage 240GB 100000 IOPS
MX200 500MB 100000 IOPS
Difference: 0 (0%)

Random Write

HyperX Savage 240GB 89000 IOPS
MX200 500MB 87000 IOPS
Difference: 2000 (2%)

Sequential Read

HyperX Savage 240GB 560 MB/sec
MX200 500MB 555 MB/sec
Difference: 5 (1%)

Sequential Write

HyperX Savage 240GB 530 MB/sec
MX200 500MB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 30 (6%)


HyperX Savage 240GB 306 TB
MX200 500MB 160 TB
Difference: 146 (91%)

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

HyperX Savage 240GB

MX200 500MB

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show ssds with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model HyperX Savage 240GB MX200 500MB
Manufacturer Kingston Crucial
NAND Toshiba’s A19 64Gbit MLC Micron 16nm 128Gbit MLC
Form Factor 2.5" 2.5"
Capacity 240 GB 500 GB
Cache 256 MB 512 MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 555 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 500 MB/s
Random Read 100000 IOPS 100000 IOPS
Random Write 89000 IOPS 87000 IOPS
Interface SATA III 6Gb/s SATA III 6Gb/s
Controller Phison PS3110-S10 Marvell 88SS9189
Date Released 2015 2015
Endurance 306 TB 160 TB
Notes Three-year warranty - 1 million hours MTBF TCG Opal 2.0 & IEEE-1667 (eDrive)