Compare any two Solid State Drives:

VS

Crucial BX500 960GB vs Kingston KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts

Capacity

BX500 960GB 1024 GB
KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 256 GB
Difference: 768 (300%)

Random Read

BX500 960GB N/A IOPS
KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 350000 IOPS
Difference: -350000 (-100%)

Random Write

BX500 960GB N/A IOPS
KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 200000 IOPS
Difference: -200000 (-100%)

Sequential Read

KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 3000 MB/sec
BX500 960GB 540 MB/sec
Difference: 2460 (456%)

Sequential Write

KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 1100 MB/sec
BX500 960GB 500 MB/sec
Difference: 600 (120%)

Endurance

BX500 960GB 240 TB
KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB 150 TB
Difference: 90 (60%)

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model BX500 960GB KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB
Manufacturer Crucial Kingston
NAND Micron 64L TLC Toshiba BiCS4 96L TLC
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III M.2 (2280)
Capacity 1024 GB 256 GB
Cache N/A MB (N/A) MB
Sequential Read 540 MB/s 3000 MB/s
Sequential Write 500 MB/s 1100 MB/s
Random Read N/A IOPS 350000 IOPS
Random Write N/A IOPS 200000 IOPS
Interface SATA III NVMe 1.3
Controller Silicon Motion SM2258XT SMI 2262EN
Date Released 2019 2019
Endurance 240 TB 150 TB
Notes 3-Year Warranty 5-Year Limited Warranty

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

BX500 960GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

KC2000 NVMe SSD 250GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.