Compare any two Solid State Drives:

VS

Samsung 870 Evo 250GB vs Seagate BarraCuda 510 256GB

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Specification Charts

Capacity

BarraCuda 510 256GB 256 GB
870 Evo 250GB 250 GB
Difference: 6 (2%)

Random Read

870 Evo 250GB 980000 IOPS
BarraCuda 510 256GB 180000 IOPS
Difference: 800000 (444%)

Random Write

BarraCuda 510 256GB 255000 IOPS
870 Evo 250GB 88000 IOPS
Difference: 167000 (190%)

Sequential Read

BarraCuda 510 256GB 3050 MB/sec
870 Evo 250GB 560 MB/sec
Difference: 2490 (445%)

Sequential Write

BarraCuda 510 256GB 1050 MB/sec
870 Evo 250GB 530 MB/sec
Difference: 520 (98%)

Endurance

BarraCuda 510 256GB 160 TB
870 Evo 250GB 150 TB
Difference: 10 (7%)

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model 870 Evo 250GB BarraCuda 510 256GB
Manufacturer Samsung Seagate
NAND Samsung 128L TLC Toshiba BiCS3 64L TLC
Form Factor 2.5" SATA III M.2 (2280)
Capacity 250 GB 256 GB
Cache 256 MB (N/A) MB
Sequential Read 560 MB/s 3050 MB/s
Sequential Write 530 MB/s 1050 MB/s
Random Read 980000 IOPS 180000 IOPS
Random Write 88000 IOPS 255000 IOPS
Interface SATA III NVMe 1.3
Controller Samsung MKX Metis Phison E12
Date Released 2021 2019
Endurance 150 TB 160 TB
Notes 5-Year Warranty 5-Year Warranty

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

870 Evo 250GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

BarraCuda 510 256GB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.