Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 4870 2GB


Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti features a GPU core speed of 822 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM is set to run at 1002 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 Stream Processors, 64 Texture Address Units, and 32 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon HD 4870 2GB, which has core speeds of 750 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 800(160x5) SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4870 2GB 150 Watts
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
Difference: 20 Watts (13%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should be a little bit faster than the Radeon HD 4870 2GB in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4870 2GB 115200 MB/sec
Difference: 13056 (11%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be a lot (approximately 75%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the Radeon HD 4870 2GB. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4870 2GB 30000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 22608 (75%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4870 2GB 12000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 14304 (119%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon HD 4870 2GB

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Ti Radeon HD 4870 2GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 2011 Jun 25, 2008
Code Name GF114 RV770 XT
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 822 MHz 750 MHz
Memory Speed 4008 MHz 3600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 150 watts
Bandwidth 128256 MB/sec 115200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 52608 Mtexels/sec 30000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 26304 Mpixels/sec 12000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 384 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 64 40
Render Output Units 32 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 55 nm
Transistors 1950 million 956 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.0

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Radeon HD 4870 2GB

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]