 |
 |
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB vs GeForce GT 210
Intro
The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB has a GPU core clock speed of 600 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR3 RAM is set to run at 900 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is made up of 112 SPUs, 56 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.Compare those specs to the GeForce GT 210, which makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 589 MHz. The DDR3 memory runs at a speed of 800 MHz on this particular model. It features 16 SPUs along with 8 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
31 Watts |
| GeForce 8800 GT 512MB |
|
105 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically, the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB should perform much faster than the GeForce GT 210 in general. (explain)
| GeForce 8800 GT 512MB |
|
57600 MB/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
12800 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB is much (approximately 613%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 210. (explain)| GeForce 8800 GT 512MB |
|
33600 Mtexels/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
4712 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB is much (more or less 307%) better at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 210, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)| GeForce 8800 GT 512MB |
|
9600 Mpixels/sec |
| GeForce GT 210 |
|
2356 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
GeForce 8800 GT 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GT 210Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | GeForce 8800 GT 512MB | GeForce GT 210 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | nVidia | nVidia |
| Year | Oct 2007 | October 2009 |
| Code Name | G92 | GT218 |
| Memory | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Core Speed | 600 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 105 watts | 31 watts |
| Bandwidth | 57600 MB/sec | 12800 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 33600 Mtexels/sec | 4712 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 9600 Mpixels/sec | 2356 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 112 | 16 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 56 | 8 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 4 |
| Bus Type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 64-bit |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Transistors | 754 million | 260 million |
| Bus | PCIe x16 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10 | DirectX 10.1 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 3.2 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
GeForce 8800 GT 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
GeForce GT 210Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
2 Responses to “GeForce 8800 GT 512MB vs GeForce GT 210”[...] Originally Posted by donkeyshot123 Hello every1 I would like to know, if this is enough to play BF3: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9300 @ 2.50GHz 2.50GHz RAM: 4GB GeForce GT 210 (i know i need a Geforce GT 560 at least) Thanks for spending your time. You don't need a GTX560 atleast, but its recommended. And no, your graphics card falls SO far below the minimum which is a 8800gt GeForce 8800 GT 512MB vs GeForce GT 210 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]
You have the exact same specs as mu computer. Do you have a Gateway FX7026? My specs are: Intel Core 2 2.50GHz quad Q9300 with the Intel G33 chipset, 8GB RAM (I maxed at 8GB), and a GeForce GT 210 with 400 watt powers supply.