Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 uses a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 633 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a frequency of 1134 MHz on this card. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, which features GPU clock speed of 822 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1002 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 384 Stream Processors, 64 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 49 Watts (29%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 560 Ti should be just a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 275 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Difference: 1248 (1%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti will be a little bit (about 4%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 275. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1968 (4%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 560 Ti is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 8580 (48%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year April 9, 2009 January 2011
Code Name G200b GF114
Fab Process 55 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 822 MHz
Shader Speed 1404 MHz 1645 MHz
Memory Speed 1134 MHz (2268 MHz effective) 1002 MHz (4008 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 240 384
Texture Mapping Units 80 64
Render Output Units 28 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 170 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 128256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 52608 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 26304 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 275 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti”

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree