Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970

Intro

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti has core speeds of 822 MHz on the GPU, and 1002 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 384 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 6970, which has a clock speed of 880 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1375 MHz. It also makes use of a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It features 1536 SPUs, 96 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Settings: Highest Settings
AA: 4x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
Radeon HD 6970 56 FPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 49 FPS
Difference: 7 FPS (14%)

DiRT 2

Settings: Highest Details
AA: 4x
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
Radeon HD 6970 85 FPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 83 FPS
Difference: 2 FPS (2%)

Just Cause 2

Settings: Highest Settings
AA: 4x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920(ES) @ 4.0Ghz (Turbo Mode Enabled) (Source)
Radeon HD 6970 62 FPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 55 FPS
Difference: 7 FPS (13%)

Radeon HD 6970 wins

(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)

When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the Radeon HD 6970 wins overall, by 16 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.

Radeon HD 6970 203 FPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 187 FPS
Difference: 16 FPS (9%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 170 Watts
Radeon HD 6970 250 Watts
Difference: 80 Watts (47%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 6970 should theoretically be quite a bit faster than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6970 176000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 128256 MB/sec
Difference: 47744 (37%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6970 will be much (more or less 61%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti. (explain)

Radeon HD 6970 84480 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 52608 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 31872 (61%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6970 should be a small bit (more or less 7%) faster with regards to AA than the GeForce GTX 560 Ti, and also able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon HD 6970 28160 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 26304 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1856 (7%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 6970

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 560 Ti Radeon HD 6970
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year January 2011 December 2010
Code Name GF114 Cayman XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
Memory 1024 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 822 MHz 880 MHz
Shader Speed 1645 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1002 MHz (4008 MHz effective) 1375 MHz (5500 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 384 1536
Texture Mapping Units 64 96
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 170 watts 250 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 128256 MB/sec 176000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 52608 Mtexels/sec 84480 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 26304 Mpixels/sec 28160 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

3 Responses to “GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970”

[...] ma di PC...ascolta vatti a vedere bene i bench...560ti meglio della 6970 mi fa abbastanza sorridereGeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare la 6950 2gb con la 560TI supera di poco la 6950 , ma alla fine si equivalgono...io sto parlando di [...]

[...] His budget max out @ SGD250; SGD250 could get you a reference 6970/6950 if you're barely lucky. GeForce GTX 560 Ti vs Radeon HD 6970 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree