Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 210 vs Radeon HD 4650 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 210 makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 589 MHz. The DDR3 RAM runs at a speed of 800 MHz on this particular model. It features 16 SPUs as well as 8 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 4650 1GB, which features a core clock speed of 600 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 700 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 55 nm design. It is comprised of 320(64x5) SPUs, 32 TAUs, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 210 31 Watts
Radeon HD 4650 1GB 55 Watts
Difference: 24 Watts (77%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon HD 4650 1GB should perform much faster than the GeForce GT 210 in general. (explain)

Radeon HD 4650 1GB 22400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 210 12800 MB/sec
Difference: 9600 (75%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 4650 1GB will be much (more or less 307%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 210. (explain)

Radeon HD 4650 1GB 19200 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 210 4712 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 14488 (307%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 4650 1GB will be quite a bit (more or less 104%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GT 210, and also will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon HD 4650 1GB 4800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 210 2356 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2444 (104%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 210

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 4650 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 210 Radeon HD 4650 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2009 Sep 10, 2008
Code Name GT218 RV730 PRO
Fab Process 40 nm 55 nm
Bus PCIe 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16, AGP 8x
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 589 MHz 600 MHz
Shader Speed 1402 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 800 MHz (1600 MHz effective) 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 16 320(64x5)
Texture Mapping Units 8 32
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type DDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 64-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.2 OpenGL 3.0
Power (Max TDP) 31 watts 55 watts
Shader Model 4.1 4.1
Bandwidth 12800 MB/sec 22400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 4712 Mtexels/sec 19200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2356 Mpixels/sec 4800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GT 210 vs Radeon HD 4650 1GB”
Fabih-ul-owais says:
I was going through nvidia gt 210 1gb ddr3 for so long. I couldnt play latest games on suitable resolution. It made me feel so bore. After some time i prefered amd ati raedon 4650 1gb ddr3. It was so amazing to play games through that. In short amd is much better than nvidia

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing