Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 460 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850
IntroThe GeForce GTX 460 1GB has a GPU core speed of 675 MHz, and the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory is set to run at 900 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 336 SPUs, 56 Texture Address Units, and 32 Raster Operation Units.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6850, which makes use of a 40 nm design. ATi has clocked the core speed at 775 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1000 MHz on this specific model. It features 960 SPUs along with 48 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.
(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthAs far as performance goes, the Radeon HD 6850 should theoretically be a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 460 1GB overall. (explain)
Texel RateThe GeForce GTX 460 1GB is a small bit (approximately 2%) faster with regards to AF than the Radeon HD 6850. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon HD 6850 should be a bit (more or less 15%) more effective at AA than the GeForce GTX 460 1GB, and also capable of handling higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price ComparisonPlease note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.
Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.
|
Comments
5 Responses to “GeForce GTX 460 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850”[...] [...]
[...] el uso de win 64bits... y aqui te dejo la tarjeta de video que voy a usar (supuestamente ) GeForce GTX 460 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare la compare con la que te recomendo arh91........ varia en 4991 (pago cash) en pcfactory y si no [...]
[...] Graphics Cards related queries here. Look at the comparisions here. GTX 460 and HD 6850: GeForce GTX 460 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare Winner -- HD 6850 GTX 550Ti and HD 6770 GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Radeon HD 6770 – Performance [...]
HD 6850 CLEAR WINNER THIS CARD WILL LAST YOU 3-4 YEARS VERY GOOD PERFORMANCE TRUST ME !
[...] crossfired xD) If you're dead set on one of those two cards, the 6850 is the way to go (see here:GeForce GTX 460 1GB vs Radeon HD 6850 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare) That CPU is pretty decent, it's 5th down from the top (See here: Gaming CPU Hierarchy Chart : [...]