Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 250 1GB vs GeForce GTX 460

Intro

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB uses a 65/55 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 738 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM runs at a frequency of 1100 MHz on this card. It features 128 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the GeForce GTX 460, which makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 675 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 900 MHz on this specific model. It features 336 SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 24 Rasterization Operator Units.

Avatar

Settings: Ultra High Quality
AA: 8x
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 460 48 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 31 FPS
Difference: 17 FPS (55%)

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 460 35 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 25 FPS
Difference: 10 FPS (40%)

Left4Dead 2

Settings: Very High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 460 77 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 58 FPS
Difference: 19 FPS (33%)

Mass Effect 2

Settings: Maximum Quality
AA: none
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 460 91 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70 FPS
Difference: 21 FPS (30%)

Supreme Commander 2

Settings: High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 460 75 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 31 FPS
Difference: 44 FPS (142%)

GeForce GTX 460 wins

(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)

When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the GeForce GTX 460 wins overall, by 111 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.

GeForce GTX 460 326 FPS
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 215 FPS
Difference: 111 FPS (52%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 145 Watts
GeForce GTX 460 150 Watts
Difference: 5 Watts (3%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 460 should in theory perform much faster than the GeForce GTS 250 1GB in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 86400 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70400 MB/sec
Difference: 16000 (23%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB is a lot (about 25%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTX 460. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 47232 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 460 37800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 9432 (25%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 460 is the winner, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 460 16200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 11808 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4392 (37%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

GeForce GTX 460

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 250 1GB GeForce GTX 460
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year March 3, 2009 July 2010
Code Name G92a/b GF104
Fab Process 65/55 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
Memory 1024 MB 768 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 675 MHz
Shader Speed 1836 MHz 1350 MHz
Memory Speed 1100 MHz (2200 MHz effective) 900 MHz (3600 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 128 336
Texture Mapping Units 64 56
Render Output Units 16 24
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 192-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 145 watts 150 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 70400 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 47232 Mtexels/sec 37800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 11808 Mpixels/sec 16200 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTS 250 1GB vs GeForce GTX 460”
[...] between the GTS 250 and the GTX 460. The GTX 460 obviously comes out on top but by how far? GeForce GTS 250 1GB vs GeForce GTX 460 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare I would also look into the GTX 560 1GB 256bit model, it's about twice as fast as the GTX 460 and [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree