Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6770
IntroThe GeForce GTX 460 uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 675 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 900 MHz on this particular model. It features 336 SPUs along with 56 TAUs and 24 ROPs.Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6770, which has core speeds of 900 MHz on the GPU, and 1050 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 800 SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthThe GeForce GTX 460 should theoretically be much faster than the Radeon HD 6770 in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe GeForce GTX 460 should be a bit (approximately 5%) more effective at AF than the Radeon HD 6770. (explain)
Pixel RateIf using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 460 is a better choice, but only just. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
3 Responses to “GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon HD 6770”[...] driveri disponibili. (in momentul asta 11.6) Unde ai vazut sa fie cu +35% mai performanta? http://www.hwcompare.com/8115/geforc...adeon-hd-6770/ O bate gtx 460 care nici macar asta nu e cu 35% mai performant ca un [...]
[...] The NVidia GeForce GTX 460 is in a higher price range at $149 (about 15% more performance than 6770) Proof: http://www.hwcompare.com/8115/geforce-gt [...]
[...] GeForce GTX 460 is in a higher price range at $149 (about 15% more performance than 6770) Proof: http://www.hwcompare.com/8115/geforce-gtThe Radeon HD 6850 is $10 more than the GTX 460, (but offers about 40% more performance)Proof: [...]