Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 vs GeForce GT 220 GDDR3

Intro

The GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 550 MHz. The DDR2 memory runs at a speed of 500 MHz on this model. It features 32 SPUs as well as 16 Texture Address Units and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3, which uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 625 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a frequency of 1012 MHz on this specific card. It features 48 SPUs along with 16 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 50 Watts
GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 58 Watts
Difference: 8 Watts (16%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 should theoretically be much better than the GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 overall. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 32384 MB/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 16000 MB/sec
Difference: 16384 (102%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 should be just a bit (about 14%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce 9500 GT DDR2. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 10000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 8800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1200 (14%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 is the winner, not by a very large margin though. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 5000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 4400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 600 (14%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2

Amazon.com

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 GeForce GT 220 GDDR3
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year July 2008 October 2009
Code Name G96a GT216
Fab Process 65 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0, PCI PCIe 2.0
Memory 256 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 550 MHz 625 MHz
Shader Speed 1400 MHz 1360 MHz
Memory Speed 1000 MHz 2024 MHz
Unified Shaders 32 48
Texture Mapping Units 16 16
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 50 watts 58 watts
Shader Model 4.0 4.1
Bandwidth 16000 MB/sec 32384 MB/sec
Texel Rate 8800 Mtexels/sec 10000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4400 Mpixels/sec 5000 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing