Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

A Question

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 vs GeForce GT 220 GDDR3

Intro

The GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 has core clock speeds of 550 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 256 MB of DDR2 RAM. It features 32 SPUs as well as 16 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3, which has GPU clock speed of 625 MHz, and 512 MB of GDDR3 memory set to run at 1012 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 48 Stream Processors, 16 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 50 Watts
GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 58 Watts
Difference: 8 Watts (16%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 should theoretically be a lot faster than the GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 in general. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 32384 MB/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 16000 MB/sec
Difference: 16384 (102%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 should be a little bit (more or less 14%) faster with regards to AF than the GeForce 9500 GT DDR2. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 10000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 8800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1200 (14%)

Pixel Rate

If running with lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 is the winner, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 5000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 4400 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 600 (14%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 9500 GT DDR2

Amazon.com

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 9500 GT DDR2 GeForce GT 220 GDDR3
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year July 2008 October 2009
Code Name G96a GT216
Fab Process 65 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0, PCI PCIe 2.0
Memory 256 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 550 MHz 625 MHz
Shader Speed 1400 MHz 1360 MHz
Memory Speed 1000 MHz 2024 MHz
Unified Shaders 32 48
Texture Mapping Units 16 16
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 50 watts 58 watts
Shader Model 4.0 4.1
Bandwidth 16000 MB/sec 32384 MB/sec
Texel Rate 8800 Mtexels/sec 10000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4400 Mpixels/sec 5000 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]