Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260


The GeForce GTS 450 comes with a GPU core clock speed of 783 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR5 RAM runs at 902 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 192 Stream Processors, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the GeForce GTX 260, which features a clock frequency of 576 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 999 MHz. It also uses a 448-bit memory bus, and uses a 65 nm design. It is comprised of 192 SPUs, 64 TAUs, and 28 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 450 106 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 76 Watts (72%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 should perform a lot faster than the GeForce GTS 450 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 450 57728 MB/sec
Difference: 54160 (94%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 should be quite a bit (about 47%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTS 450. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 25056 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11808 (47%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 should be quite a bit (approximately 29%) faster with regards to FSAA than the GeForce GTS 450, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 12528 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3600 (29%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTS 450

GeForce GTX 260

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 450 GeForce GTX 260
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 2010 June 16, 2008
Code Name GF106 G200
Memory 512 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 783 MHz 576 MHz
Memory Speed 3608 MHz 1998 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 106 watts 182 watts
Bandwidth 57728 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25056 Mtexels/sec 36864 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12528 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 192 192
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 28
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 65 nm
Transistors 1170 million 1400 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.


One Response to “GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260”
gliterman says:

An useful article, I was searching for something like this as I've got a 260 and a nice offer for a gts450
After having a look at the article, I will continue with my 260..

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield