Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260

Intro

The GeForce GTS 450 makes use of a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 783 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM is set to run at a frequency of 902 MHz on this specific card. It features 192 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTX 260, which makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a speed of 999 MHz on this model. It features 192 SPUs along with 64 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 450 106 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 182 Watts
Difference: 76 Watts (72%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce GTX 260 should perform much faster than the GeForce GTS 450 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 450 57728 MB/sec
Difference: 54160 (94%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 will be quite a bit (more or less 47%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce GTS 450. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 36864 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 25056 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11808 (47%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 is quite a bit (approximately 29%) better at FSAA than the GeForce GTS 450, and also capable of handling higher resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 16128 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 12528 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3600 (29%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTS 450

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 260

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 450 GeForce GTX 260
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 2010 June 16, 2008
Code Name GF106 G200
Fab Process 40 nm 65 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16 2.0
Memory 512 MB 896 MB
Core Speed 783 MHz 576 MHz
Shader Speed 1566 MHz 1242 MHz
Memory Speed 902 MHz (3608 MHz effective) 999 MHz (1998 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 192 192
Texture Mapping Units 32 64
Render Output Units 16 28
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 448-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.1
Power (Max TDP) 106 watts 182 watts
Shader Model 5.0 4.0
Bandwidth 57728 MB/sec 111888 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25056 Mtexels/sec 36864 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12528 Mpixels/sec 16128 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260”
gliterman says:
An useful article, I was searching for something like this as I've got a 260 and a nice offer for a gts450
After having a look at the article, I will continue with my 260..

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WP-SpamFree by Pole Position Marketing