Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon HD 6770

Intro

The GeForce GTS 450 features core clock speeds of 783 MHz on the GPU, and 902 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 192 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon HD 6770, which comes with GPU core speed of 900 MHz, and 512 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1050 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 800 SPUs, 40 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTS 450 106 Watts
Radeon HD 6770 108 Watts
Difference: 2 Watts (2%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon HD 6770 should in theory be a bit better than the GeForce GTS 450 in general. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 67200 MB/sec
GeForce GTS 450 57728 MB/sec
Difference: 9472 (16%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6770 should be quite a bit (approximately 44%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTS 450. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 36000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 25056 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10944 (44%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6770 is a bit (more or less 15%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTS 450, and will be able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon HD 6770 14400 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTS 450 12528 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1872 (15%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTS 450

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 6770

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GTS 450 Radeon HD 6770
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2010 January 2011
Code Name GF106 Juniper XT
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
Memory 512 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 783 MHz 900 MHz
Shader Speed 1566 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 902 MHz (3608 MHz effective) 1050 MHz (4200 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 192 800
Texture Mapping Units 32 40
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 106 watts 108 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 57728 MB/sec 67200 MB/sec
Texel Rate 25056 Mtexels/sec 36000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 12528 Mpixels/sec 14400 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

3 Responses to “GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon HD 6770”
[...] ok.. tine un q6600 si 9800 Gt. Hd 6770 comparat cu gts 450 (512 mb dar e valabil si pt 1gb). http://www.hwcompare.com/7617/geforc...adeon-hd-6770/ Carcasa o avea tabla subtire dar e bine ventilata si [...]
[...] Daca as fi in situatia ta, as schimba sursa mai intai, macar cu aceasta. Apoi m-as gandi sa achizitionez placa video. [...]
[...] Multumesc. GeForce GTS 450 vs Radeon HD 6770 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare dar aici vad ca 6770-ul e putin mai bun decat GTS450. M-ar interesa si ceva SH, dar sunt foarte [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree