Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:

GeForce GT 440 3GB vs Radeon HD 5570


The GeForce GT 440 3GB has core clock speeds of 594 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 144 SPUs along with 24 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 5570, which has GPU clock speed of 650 MHz, and 512 MB of DDR3 memory set to run at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 400(80x5) Stream Processors, 20 TAUs, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5570 43 Watts
GeForce GT 440 3GB 56 Watts
Difference: 13 Watts (30%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GT 440 3GB, in theory, should be quite a bit faster than the Radeon HD 5570 in general. (explain)

GeForce GT 440 3GB 43200 MB/sec
Radeon HD 5570 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 14400 (50%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 440 3GB should be a small bit (more or less 10%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 5570. (explain)

GeForce GT 440 3GB 14256 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 5570 13000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1256 (10%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GT 440 3GB is much (more or less 174%) faster with regards to AA than the Radeon HD 5570, and also able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GT 440 3GB 14256 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5570 5200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9056 (174%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 440 3GB

Radeon HD 5570

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.


Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 440 3GB Radeon HD 5570
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2010 February 9, 2010
Code Name GF106 Redwood PRO
Memory 3072 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 594 MHz 650 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 56 watts 43 watts
Bandwidth 43200 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 14256 Mtexels/sec 13000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14256 Mpixels/sec 5200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 144 400(80x5)
Texture Mapping Units 24 20
Render Output Units 24 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 192-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1170 million 627 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.2

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.


Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield