Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 1GB vs Radeon HD 5830

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 1GB uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 700 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 900 MHz on this model. It features 96 SPUs along with 16 Texture Address Units and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 5830, which comes with core speeds of 800 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1120(224x5) SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 430 1GB 60 Watts
Radeon HD 5830 175 Watts
Difference: 115 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon HD 5830 should theoretically perform much faster than the GeForce GT 430 1GB overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 5830 128000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 430 1GB 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 99200 (344%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 5830 is quite a bit (approximately 300%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 430 1GB. (explain)

Radeon HD 5830 44800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 430 1GB 11200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 33600 (300%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 5830 should be much (about 357%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 430 1GB, and able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

Radeon HD 5830 12800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 1GB 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10000 (357%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 430 1GB

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 5830

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 1GB Radeon HD 5830
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year October 2010 February 25, 2010
Code Name GF108 Cypress LE
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed 1400 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1000 MHz (4000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 96 1120(224x5)
Texture Mapping Units 16 56
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 175 watts
Shader Model 5.0 5.0
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 128000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 44800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree