Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 vs GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 comes with a core clock speed of 700 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 900 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It is made up of 96 SPUs, 16 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTS 250 1GB, which makes use of a 65/55 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 738 MHz. The GDDR3 memory is set to run at a speed of 1100 MHz on this specific card. It features 128 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 430 60 Watts
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 145 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (142%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GTS 250 1GB will be 144% quicker than the GeForce GT 430 overall, because of its higher data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 430 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 41600 (144%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB is quite a bit (about 322%) better at AF than the GeForce GT 430. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 47232 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 430 11200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 36032 (322%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB should be much (about 322%) better at AA than the GeForce GT 430, and also able to handle higher resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 11808 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9008 (322%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 GeForce GTS 250 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year October 2010 March 3, 2009
Code Name GF108 G92a/b
Fab Process 40 nm 65/55 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16 2.0
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 738 MHz
Shader Speed 1400 MHz 1836 MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1100 MHz (2200 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 96 128
Texture Mapping Units 16 64
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.1
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 145 watts
Shader Model 5.0 4.0
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 70400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 47232 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 11808 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree