Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 430 vs GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GT 430 has a GPU core clock speed of 700 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 96 Stream Processors, 16 Texture Address Units, and 4 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GTS 250 1GB, which has clock speeds of 738 MHz on the GPU, and 1100 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 128 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 430 60 Watts
GeForce GTS 250 1GB 145 Watts
Difference: 85 Watts (142%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTS 250 1GB should theoretically be quite a bit better than the GeForce GT 430 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 70400 MB/sec
GeForce GT 430 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 41600 (144%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB is a lot (more or less 322%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 430. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 47232 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 430 11200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 36032 (322%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTS 250 1GB will be much (about 322%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 430, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTS 250 1GB 11808 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 9008 (322%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

GeForce GTS 250 1GB

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 430 GeForce GTS 250 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year October 2010 March 3, 2009
Code Name GF108 G92a/b
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 738 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 2200 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts 145 watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 70400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 11200 Mtexels/sec 47232 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 11808 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 96 128
Texture Mapping Units 16 64
Render Output Units 4 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 65/55 nm
Transistors 585 million 754 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16 2.0
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 10
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 3.1

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]