Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 vs GeForce GT 430

Intro

The GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 comes with core speeds of 625 MHz on the GPU, and 1012 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 48 SPUs as well as 16 TAUs and 8 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the GeForce GT 430, which features core speeds of 700 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR3 RAM. It features 96 SPUs along with 16 TAUs and 4 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 58 Watts
GeForce GT 430 60 Watts
Difference: 2 Watts (3%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 should be 12% quicker than the GeForce GT 430 in general, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 32384 MB/sec
GeForce GT 430 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 3584 (12%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GT 430 should be just a bit (approximately 12%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 220 GDDR3. (explain)

GeForce GT 430 11200 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 10000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1200 (12%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 will be quite a bit (approximately 79%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GT 430, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 5000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 430 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 2200 (79%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 220 GDDR3

Amazon.com

GeForce GT 430

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 220 GDDR3 GeForce GT 430
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year October 2009 October 2010
Code Name GT216 GF108
Memory 512 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 625 MHz 700 MHz
Memory Speed 2024 MHz 1800 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 58 watts 60 watts
Bandwidth 32384 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 10000 Mtexels/sec 11200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 5000 Mpixels/sec 2800 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 96
Texture Mapping Units 16 16
Render Output Units 8 4
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 486 million 585 million
Bus PCIe 2.0 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.2 OpenGL 4.1

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]