Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon HD 6750

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 uses a 40 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 540 MHz. The GDDR3 memory runs at a speed of 790 MHz on this particular model. It features 72 SPUs along with 24 Texture Address Units and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 6750, which features core clock speeds of 725 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 720 SPUs along with 36 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon HD 6750 86 Watts
Difference: 43 Watts (100%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon HD 6750 should be 153% faster than the GeForce GT 320 overall, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 64000 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 38720 (153%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 is quite a bit (about 101%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 26100 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 13140 (101%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6750 will be much (approximately 169%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the GeForce GT 320, and will be able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon HD 6750 11600 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 7280 (169%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon HD 6750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 January 2011
Code Name GT215 Juniper Pro
Memory 1024 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 86 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 26100 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 720
Texture Mapping Units 24 36
Render Output Units 8 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 40 nm
Transistors 727 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.0

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield