Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8800 Ultra vs Radeon HD 6850

Intro

The GeForce 8800 Ultra uses a 90 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 612 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a frequency of 1080 MHz on this particular model. It features 128 SPUs as well as 64 Texture Address Units and 24 ROPs.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 6850, which has GPU clock speed of 775 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1000 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also features 960 Stream Processors, 48 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6850 127 Watts
GeForce 8800 Ultra 171 Watts
Difference: 44 Watts (35%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon HD 6850 should perform a lot faster than the GeForce 8800 Ultra overall. (explain)

Radeon HD 6850 128000 MB/sec
GeForce 8800 Ultra 103680 MB/sec
Difference: 24320 (23%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 8800 Ultra will be a small bit (more or less 5%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 6850. (explain)

GeForce 8800 Ultra 39168 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 6850 37200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 1968 (5%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon HD 6850 should be a lot (approximately 69%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce 8800 Ultra, and capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

Radeon HD 6850 24800 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8800 Ultra 14688 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 10112 (69%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce 8800 Ultra

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 6850

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model GeForce 8800 Ultra Radeon HD 6850
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year May 2007 October 2010
Code Name G80 Barts Pro
Fab Process 90 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe x16
Memory 768 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 612 MHz 775 MHz
Shader Speed 1500 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1080 MHz 1000 MHz
Unified Shaders 128 960
Texture Mapping Units 64 48
Render Output Units 24 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 384-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.1
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts 127 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 103680 MB/sec 128000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 39168 Mtexels/sec 37200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 14688 Mpixels/sec 24800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Facebook Activity

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree