Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon HD 6750

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 features a GPU clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 216 SPUs, 72 Texture Address Units, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specs to the Radeon HD 6750, which features clock speeds of 725 MHz on the GPU, and 1000 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 720 SPUs along with 36 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 6750 86 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 116 Watts (135%)

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 should theoretically be a lot faster than the Radeon HD 6750 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Radeon HD 6750 64000 MB/sec
Difference: 47888 (75%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be a lot (about 59%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 6750. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 6750 26100 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 15372 (59%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a better choice, by a large margin. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 6750 11600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4528 (39%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon HD 6750
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 January 2011
Code Name G200 Juniper Pro
Memory 896 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 86 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 26100 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 720
Texture Mapping Units 72 36
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 40 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.0

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon HD 6750

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield