Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon R9 285

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1650 has clock speeds of 1485 MHz on the GPU, and 2001 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 896 SPUs as well as 56 TAUs and 32 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 285, which features core clock speeds of 918 MHz on the GPU, and 1375 MHz on the 2048 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 1792 SPUs as well as 112 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1650 75 Watts
Radeon R9 285 190 Watts
Difference: 115 Watts (153%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 285, in theory, should be a lot faster than the GeForce GTX 1650 overall. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 176000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 131072 MB/sec
Difference: 44928 (34%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 285 should be much (more or less 24%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 1650. (explain)

Radeon R9 285 102816 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 1650 83160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 19656 (24%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1650 will be much (about 62%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 285, and should be able to handle higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1650 47520 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 285 29376 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 18144 (62%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1650 Radeon R9 285
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2019 September 2014
Code Name TU117-300-A1 Tonga PRO
Memory 4096 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1485 MHz 918 MHz
Memory Speed 8004 MHz 5500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 190 watts
Bandwidth 131072 MB/sec 176000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 83160 Mtexels/sec 102816 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 47520 Mpixels/sec 29376 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 896 1792
Texture Mapping Units 56 112
Render Output Units 32 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 12 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4700 million 5000 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.6 OpenGL 4.4

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1650

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 285

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield