Geforce GTX 1080 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which has core speeds of 1050 MHz on the GPU, and 500 MHz on the 4096 MB of HBM RAM. It features 4096 SPUs as well as 256 TAUs and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		27629 points
Radeon R9 Fury X		14793 points
	Difference: 12836 (87%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		710 Sol/s
Radeon R9 Fury X		450 Sol/s
	Difference: 260 (58%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X		275 Watts
	Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R9 Fury X should be 3% quicker than the Geforce GTX 1080 Ti overall, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X		512000 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		495616 MB/sec
	Difference: 16384 (3%)

Texel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti will be quite a bit (more or less 23%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 Fury X. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		331520 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		268800 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 62720 (23%)

Pixel Rate

The Geforce GTX 1080 Ti is a lot (about 94%) better at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R9 Fury X, and should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Geforce GTX 1080 Ti		130240 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X		67200 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 63040 (94%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in one second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.