Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon RX 460

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 has a GPU core speed of 633 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 1134 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also is made up of 240 Stream Processors, 80 TAUs, and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon RX 460, which has GPU core speed of 1090 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1750 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is comprised of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon RX 460 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 144 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be just a bit better than the Radeon RX 460 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon RX 460 112000 MB/sec
Difference: 15008 (13%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 460 will be much (about 21%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 275. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 61040 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10400 (21%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be a bit (about 2%) more effective at full screen anti-aliasing than the Radeon RX 460, and will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon RX 460 17440 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 284 (2%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Radeon RX 460

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon RX 460
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 August 2016
Code Name G200b Polaris 11
Memory 896 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 1090 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 7000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 75 watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 112000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 61040 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 17440 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 896
Texture Mapping Units 80 56
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 14 nm
Transistors 1400 million 3000 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (measured in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]