Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon RX 460


Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 features a GPU clock speed of 633 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 RAM is set to run at 1134 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 240 SPUs, 80 Texture Address Units, and 28 ROPs.

Compare all of that to the Radeon RX 460, which has GPU clock speed of 1090 MHz, and 4096 MB of GDDR5 RAM set to run at 1750 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 896 SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon RX 460 75 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 144 Watts (192%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be just a bit superior to the Radeon RX 460 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon RX 460 112000 MB/sec
Difference: 15008 (13%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon RX 460 is quite a bit (more or less 21%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 275. (explain)

Radeon RX 460 61040 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10400 (21%)

Pixel Rate

If using lots of anti-aliasing is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 275 is superior to the Radeon RX 460, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon RX 460 17440 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 284 (2%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce GTX 275

Radeon RX 460

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon RX 460
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 August 2016
Code Name G200b Polaris 11
Memory 896 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 1090 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 7000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 75 watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 112000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 61040 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 17440 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 896
Texture Mapping Units 80 56
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 14 nm
Transistors 1400 million 3000 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in one second. The number is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

GeForce GTX 275

Radeon RX 460

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]