Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB vs Geforce GTX 760

Intro

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has clock speeds of 1506 MHz on the GPU, and 2000 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 1152 SPUs along with 72 Texture Address Units and 48 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Geforce GTX 760, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core frequency at 980 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a speed of 1502 MHz on this specific model. It features 1152 SPUs as well as 96 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 120 Watts
Geforce GTX 760 170 Watts
Difference: 50 Watts (42%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB should theoretically be just a bit better than the Geforce GTX 760 in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 196608 MB/sec
Geforce GTX 760 192256 MB/sec
Difference: 4352 (2%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is a little bit (approximately 15%) better at AF than the Geforce GTX 760. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 108432 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 760 94080 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 14352 (15%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is much (approximately 131%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the Geforce GTX 760, and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB 72288 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 760 31360 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 40928 (131%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

Amazon.com

Geforce GTX 760

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 1060 3GB Geforce GTX 760
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year August 2016 June 2013
Code Name GP106-300 GK104
Memory 3072 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1506 MHz 980 MHz
Memory Speed 8000 MHz 6008 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 120 watts 170 watts
Bandwidth 196608 MB/sec 192256 MB/sec
Texel Rate 108432 Mtexels/sec 94080 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 72288 Mpixels/sec 31360 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1152 1152
Texture Mapping Units 72 96
Render Output Units 48 32
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 192-bit 256-bit
Fab Process 16 nm 28 nm
Transistors 4400 million 3540 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of data (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield


[X]
[X]