GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features a clock frequency of 1000 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also features a 4096-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 Nano		14918 points
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		3434 points
	Difference: 11484 (334%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Nano		30 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		10 Mh/s
	Difference: 20 (200%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 650 Ti		110 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano		175 Watts
	Difference: 65 Watts (59%)

Memory Bandwidth

The Radeon R9 Nano should theoretically be much faster than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		86400 MB/sec
	Difference: 425600 (493%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano should be a lot (about 331%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		59392 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 196608 (331%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano will be much (approximately 331%) better at FSAA than the GeForce GTX 650 Ti, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano		64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 650 Ti		14848 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 49152 (331%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.