Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 810M vs Radeon R9 Nano

Intro

The GeForce 810M has a clock speed of 738 MHz and a DDR3 memory speed of 900 MHz. It also features a 64-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is made up of 48 SPUs, 8 Texture Address Units, and 4 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 Nano, which features GPU clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM RAM running at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is comprised of 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 810M 15 Watts
Radeon R9 Nano 175 Watts
Difference: 160 Watts (1067%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 Nano should in theory be a lot better than the GeForce 810M in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 512000 MB/sec
GeForce 810M 14400 MB/sec
Difference: 497600 (3456%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Nano is much (about 4236%) better at AF than the GeForce 810M. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 256000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 810M 5904 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 250096 (4236%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R9 Nano is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon R9 Nano 64000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 810M 2952 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 61048 (2068%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 810M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 810M Radeon R9 Nano
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 September 2015
Code Name GF117 Fiji XT
Memory 1024 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 738 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 15 watts 175 watts
Bandwidth 14400 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5904 Mtexels/sec 256000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2952 Mpixels/sec 64000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 4096
Texture Mapping Units 8 256
Render Output Units 4 64
Bus Type DDR3 HBM
Bus Width 64-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million 8900 million
Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 12.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. The number is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card could possibly write to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 810M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Nano

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield