Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

Radeon HD 4890 1GB vs Radeon HD 5830

Intro

The Radeon HD 4890 1GB uses a 55 nm design. ATi has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a frequency of 975 MHz on this particular model. It features 800(160x5) SPUs as well as 40 Texture Address Units and 16 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 5830, which comes with a core clock speed of 800 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1000 MHz. It also uses a 256-bit bus, and makes use of a 40 nm design. It features 1120(224x5) SPUs, 56 TAUs, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Avatar

Settings: Ultra High Quality
AA: 8x
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 5830 41 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 36 FPS
Difference: 5 FPS (14%)

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 36 FPS
Radeon HD 5830 35 FPS
Difference: 1 FPS (3%)

Left4Dead 2

Settings: Very High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 88 FPS
Radeon HD 5830 81 FPS
Difference: 7 FPS (9%)

Mass Effect 2

Settings: Maximum Quality
AA: none
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 107 FPS
Radeon HD 5830 97 FPS
Difference: 10 FPS (10%)

Supreme Commander 2

Settings: High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 5830 65 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 64 FPS
Difference: 1 FPS (2%)

Radeon HD 4890 1GB wins

(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)

When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the Radeon HD 4890 1GB wins overall, by 12 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.

Radeon HD 4890 1GB 331 FPS
Radeon HD 5830 319 FPS
Difference: 12 FPS (4%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5830 175 Watts
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 190 Watts
Difference: 15 Watts (9%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon HD 5830 will be 3% faster than the Radeon HD 4890 1GB in general, because of its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon HD 5830 128000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 124800 MB/sec
Difference: 3200 (3%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 5830 will be a bit (approximately 12%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Radeon HD 4890 1GB. (explain)

Radeon HD 5830 44800 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 4800 (12%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 4890 1GB is superior to the Radeon HD 5830, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon HD 4890 1GB 16000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5830 12800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3200 (25%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

Radeon HD 4890 1GB

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 5830

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model Radeon HD 4890 1GB Radeon HD 5830
Manufacturer ATi ATi
Year Apr 2, 2009 February 25, 2010
Code Name RV790 XT Cypress LE
Fab Process 55 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 800 MHz
Shader Speed N/A MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 975 MHz 1000 MHz
Unified Shaders 800(160x5) 1120(224x5)
Texture Mapping Units 40 56
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 190 watts 175 watts
Shader Model 4.1 5.0
Bandwidth 124800 MB/sec 128000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40000 Mtexels/sec 44800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16000 Mpixels/sec 12800 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Facebook Activity

Comments

One Response to “Radeon HD 4890 1GB vs Radeon HD 5830”

[...] comparable to 5830 Radeon HD 4890 1GB vs Radeon HD 5830 – Performance Comparison Benchmarks @ Hardware Compare conclusion When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the Radeon HD 4890 1GB [...]

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree