Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8600 GTS vs Radeon HD 5570

Intro

The GeForce 8600 GTS features a GPU core speed of 675 MHz, and the 512 MB of GDDR3 memory is set to run at 1000 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also features 32 Stream Processors, 16 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Compare all that to the Radeon HD 5570, which comes with GPU core speed of 650 MHz, and 512 MB of DDR3 memory running at 900 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 400(80x5) SPUs, 20 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 5570 43 Watts
GeForce 8600 GTS 75 Watts
Difference: 32 Watts (74%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically, the GeForce 8600 GTS should perform a bit faster than the Radeon HD 5570 overall. (explain)

GeForce 8600 GTS 32000 MB/sec
Radeon HD 5570 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 3200 (11%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon HD 5570 is a bit (approximately 20%) faster with regards to texture filtering than the GeForce 8600 GTS. (explain)

Radeon HD 5570 13000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8600 GTS 10800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 2200 (20%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce 8600 GTS is the winner, but not by far. (explain)

GeForce 8600 GTS 5400 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 5570 5200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 200 (4%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce 8600 GTS

Amazon.com

Radeon HD 5570

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce 8600 GTS Radeon HD 5570
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 2007 February 9, 2010
Code Name G84 Redwood PRO
Fab Process 80 nm 40 nm
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 2.1 x16
Memory 512 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 675 MHz 650 MHz
Shader Speed 1450 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1000 MHz (2000 MHz effective) 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 32 400(80x5)
Texture Mapping Units 16 20
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 3.2
Power (Max TDP) 75 watts 43 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 32000 MB/sec 28800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 10800 Mtexels/sec 13000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 5400 Mpixels/sec 5200 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type memory, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree