Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R9 M270X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1350 MHz on this card. It features 640 SPUs along with 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 M270X, which has a core clock frequency of 725 MHz and a GDDR5 memory frequency of 1125 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It is comprised of 640 SPUs, 40 Texture Address Units, and 16 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti should theoretically be a little bit faster than the Radeon R9 M270X in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 72000 MB/sec
Difference: 14400 (20%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti should be much (about 41%) better at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 M270X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 29000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11800 (41%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is superior to the Radeon R9 M270X, by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 M270X 11600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 4720 (41%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 750 Ti Radeon R9 M270X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2014 May 1 2014
Code Name GM107 Venus XT
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 1020 MHz 725 MHz
Memory Speed 5400 MHz 4500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 86400 MB/sec 72000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 40800 Mtexels/sec 29000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16320 Mpixels/sec 11600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 640 640
Texture Mapping Units 40 40
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1870 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.4 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It's calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If it uses DDR type memory, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel output rate also depends on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 M270X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield