Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R7 M260X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 965M makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 944 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1000 MHz on this particular card. It features 1024 SPUs as well as 64 TAUs and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 M260X, which comes with a core clock frequency of 825 MHz and a GDDR5 memory speed of 1000 MHz. It also makes use of a 128-bit memory bus, and uses a 28 nm design. It features 384 SPUs, 24 TAUs, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Both cards have the exact same memory bandwidth, so theoretically they should perform the same. (explain)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M will be much (approximately 205%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon R7 M260X. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 60416 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 19800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 40616 (205%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 965M will be quite a bit (approximately 358%) more effective at FSAA than the Radeon R7 M260X, and will be able to handle higher resolutions without slowing down too much. (explain)

GeForce GTX 965M 30208 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M260X 6600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 23608 (358%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 965M Radeon R7 M260X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year January 5 2015 June 2014
Code Name GM204 Opal
Memory 2048 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 944 MHz 825 MHz
Memory Speed 4000 MHz 4000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 60 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 64000 MB/sec 64000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 60416 Mtexels/sec 19800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 30208 Mpixels/sec 6600 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 1024 384
Texture Mapping Units 64 24
Render Output Units 32 8
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors (Unknown) million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 12 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (in units of MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 965M

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield