Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon R7 M260

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 has core clock speeds of 633 MHz on the GPU, and 1134 MHz on the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 240 SPUs as well as 80 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 M260, which makes use of a 28 nm design. AMD has clocked the core speed at 715 MHz. The DDR3 RAM works at a speed of 1000 MHz on this specific card. It features 384 SPUs along with 24 TAUs and 8 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 275 should in theory be a lot superior to the Radeon R7 M260 overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon R7 M260 16000 MB/sec
Difference: 111008 (694%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 will be a lot (about 195%) better at AF than the Radeon R7 M260. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon R7 M260 17160 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 33480 (195%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 will be much (about 210%) more effective at anti-aliasing than the Radeon R7 M260, and also should be capable of handling higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R7 M260 5720 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 12004 (210%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon R7 M260
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year April 9, 2009 June 2014
Code Name G200b Opal/Topaz
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 715 MHz
Memory Speed 2268 MHz 2000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts (Unknown) watts
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 16000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 17160 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 5720 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 240 384
Texture Mapping Units 80 24
Render Output Units 28 8
Bus Type GDDR3 DDR3
Bus Width 448-bit 64-bit
Fab Process 55 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million (Unknown) million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x8
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in MB per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card could possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 M260

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield