Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon R9 390 8G
IntroThe GeForce GTX 980 makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 1126 MHz. The GDDR5 memory works at a frequency of 1750 MHz on this model. It features 2048 SPUs as well as 128 Texture Address Units and 64 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon R9 390 8G, which features GPU core speed of 1000 MHz, and 8192 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 1500 MHz through a 512-bit bus. It also is made up of 2560 SPUs, 160 Texture Address Units, and 64 Raster Operation Units.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
Zcash Mining Hash Rate
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthTheoretically speaking, the Radeon R9 390 8G should be 71% faster than the GeForce GTX 980 overall, because of its greater data rate. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R9 390 8G will be a little bit (approximately 11%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX 980. (explain)
Pixel RateIf running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 980 is a better choice, not by a very large margin though. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR memory, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “GeForce GTX 980 vs Radeon R9 390 8G”OK i did some checking on YouTube for videos showing the actual performance of each of these two graphics cards.An the information on this base is wrong.The Texture Fillrate of the GTX 980 an R9 390 are the same.at 160 to 162 in favor of Nvidia.But the actual Pixel rate is completely wrong.The Pixel loads for the GTX 980 is only 36.1 on one GPU-z i found an one video live of it at exactlly 40.5 on an overclocking video.Where the AMD GPixel Fillrate was 64.0.Thats double the performance!An by no means does the GTX ram reatch 7000Mhz.That is a balled face lie! it is 1753MHz.An not 7000Mhz.The AMD is 6000MHz.So some one fix that.