Geforce GTX 670 vs Radeon R9 380 2G

Intro

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 380 2G, which has a GPU core clock speed of 970 MHz, and 2048 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1425 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also is comprised of 1792 SPUs, 112 TAUs, and 32 Raster Operation Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 380 2G		8850 points
Geforce GTX 670		7351 points
	Difference: 1499 (20%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 380 2G		19 Mh/s
Geforce GTX 670		13 Mh/s
	Difference: 6 (46%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Geforce GTX 670		170 Watts
Radeon R9 380 2G		190 Watts
	Difference: 20 Watts (12%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Geforce GTX 670 should theoretically be a small bit better than the Radeon R9 380 2G overall. (explain)

Geforce GTX 670		192000 MB/sec
Radeon R9 380 2G		182400 MB/sec
	Difference: 9600 (5%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 380 2G should be a little bit (about 6%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the Geforce GTX 670. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 2G		108640 Mtexels/sec
Geforce GTX 670		102480 Mtexels/sec
	Difference: 6160 (6%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 380 2G should be just a bit (more or less 6%) faster with regards to AA than the Geforce GTX 670, and also able to handle higher resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R9 380 2G		31040 Mpixels/sec
Geforce GTX 670		29280 Mpixels/sec
	Difference: 1760 (6%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Specifications

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transported over the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This figure is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the most pixels the video card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.