 |
 |
Radeon HD 4870 512MB vs Radeon R9 Fury X
Intro
The Radeon HD 4870 512MB comes with core clock speeds of 750 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 800(160x5) SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which comes with a core clock speed of 1050 MHz and a HBM memory frequency of 500 MHz. It also makes use of a 4096-bit memory bus, and makes use of a 28 nm design. It features 4096 SPUs, 256 Texture Address Units, and 64 ROPs.
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Power Consumption (Max TDP)
| Radeon HD 4870 512MB |
|
150 Watts |
| Radeon R9 Fury X |
|
275 Watts |
|
|
Memory Bandwidth
Theoretically, the Radeon R9 Fury X should perform much faster than the Radeon HD 4870 512MB in general. (explain)
| Radeon R9 Fury X |
|
512000 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 4870 512MB |
|
115200 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon R9 Fury X should be a lot (approximately 796%) more effective at texture filtering than the Radeon HD 4870 512MB. (explain)| Radeon R9 Fury X |
|
268800 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon HD 4870 512MB |
|
30000 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
The Radeon R9 Fury X will be much (approximately 460%) better at anti-aliasing than the Radeon HD 4870 512MB, and able to handle higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)| Radeon R9 Fury X |
|
67200 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon HD 4870 512MB |
|
12000 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 4870 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 Fury XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 4870 512MB | Radeon R9 Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | Jun 25, 2008 | June 2015 |
| Code Name | RV770 XT | Fiji XT |
| Memory | 512 MB | 4096 MB |
| Core Speed | 750 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 3600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 150 watts | 275 watts |
| Bandwidth | 115200 MB/sec | 512000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 30000 Mtexels/sec | 268800 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 12000 Mpixels/sec | 67200 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 800(160x5) | 4096 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 40 | 256 |
| Render Output Units | 16 | 64 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | HBM |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 956 million | 8900 million |
| Bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 10.1 | DirectX 12 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 3.0 | OpenGL 4.5 |
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface within a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory clock speed. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly write to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for outputting the pixels (image) to the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.
Radeon HD 4870 512MBAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 Fury XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
One Response to “Radeon HD 4870 512MB vs Radeon R9 Fury X”Lol its comical at how superior the Fury X is to old GPUs like the HD4870. I don't understand why AMD gets a bad rap. Their GPUs have improved so immensely that the games literally can't even demonstrate the vast performance gap. The Fury X is still held back by software. Just look at benchmarks of Doom Vulkan ultra. It outperforms GPUs like the GTX1070 still. Its comical that reviewers even try to compare GPUs with such performance gaps and try to say the GTX1070 is better than the Fury X or GTX980Ti.
The software itself is holding back hardware of this level