Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with core clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 6144 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 2816 SPUs as well as 176 Texture Address Units and 96 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all that to the Radeon R9 Fury X, which comes with a GPU core clock speed of 1050 MHz, and 4096 MB of HBM memory running at 500 MHz through a 4096-bit bus. It also is comprised of 4096 SPUs, 256 TAUs, and 64 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

GeForce GTX 980 Ti 17120 points
Radeon R9 Fury X 14793 points
Difference: 2327 (16%)

Grand Theft Auto V | 1920x1080 | Very High

GeForce GTX 980 Ti 80 FPS
Radeon R9 Fury X 65 FPS
Difference: 15 (23%)

Zcash Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Fury X 450 Sol/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 425 Sol/s
Difference: 25 (6%)

Ethereum Mining Hash Rate

Radeon R9 Fury X 30 Mh/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 22 Mh/s
Difference: 8 (36%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti 250 Watts
Radeon R9 Fury X 275 Watts
Difference: 25 Watts (10%)

Memory Bandwidth

As far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 Fury X should in theory be much superior to the GeForce GTX 980 Ti in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X 512000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 336000 MB/sec
Difference: 176000 (52%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 Fury X will be much (approximately 53%) faster with regards to anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. (explain)

Radeon R9 Fury X 268800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 980 Ti 176000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 92800 (53%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 980 Ti is superior to the Radeon R9 Fury X, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 980 Ti 96000 Mpixels/sec
Radeon R9 Fury X 67200 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 28800 (43%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Fury X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 980 Ti Radeon R9 Fury X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2015 June 2015
Code Name GM200 Fiji XT
Memory 6144 MB 4096 MB
Core Speed 1000 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory Speed 7000 MHz 500 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 250 watts 275 watts
Bandwidth 336000 MB/sec 512000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 176000 Mtexels/sec 268800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 96000 Mpixels/sec 67200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 2816 4096
Texture Mapping Units 176 256
Render Output Units 96 64
Bus Type GDDR5 HBM
Bus Width 384-bit 4096-bit
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 8000 million 8900 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 12
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.5

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by the speed of its memory. If the card has DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly write to the local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also sometimes called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate is also dependant on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 Fury X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 Fury X”
Stefan says:

If they just added more ROP's to the Fury X, it would have been a beast.

Ionut says:

It's just the first HBM implementation, so it's kinda experimental, wait for next one, in 2016, they will get rid of some limitations, like memory speed or 4GB maximum capacity, also will be on 20/16 nm process, just imagine that dual gpu version, with over 1 million mb/sec bandwidth, and lower TDP... Also, like you said, more ROP's would be more than welcomed. I hope they will learn from their past mistakes, and deliver best performance at good prices, and optimize their drivers.

Ionut says:

The Fury X obtained disappointing benchmark results, other than what we expected, somewhere between 980 and 980 Ti. Keep in mind that there were made under DX11, we don't know what DX12 will bring. Also, I understand that they will remove the voltage and overclock limit, and with better optimized drivers, the results could change.

Felipe Cartes says:

After the last driver update. The fury x is beating the 980ti by a 4% across the board. And that's even without the crimson drivers.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield