Compare any two graphics cards:
GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2
IntroThe GeForce GTX Titan X has a GPU core speed of 1000 MHz, and the 12288 MB of GDDR5 memory runs at 1750 MHz through a 384-bit bus. It also is made up of 3072 SPUs, 192 Texture Address Units, and 96 ROPs.Compare all that to the Radeon R9 295X2, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core speed at 1018 MHz. The GDDR5 RAM runs at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this model. It features 2816 SPUs as well as 176 TAUs and 64 ROPs.
Display Graphs
BenchmarksThese are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
Power Usage and Theoretical BenchmarksPower Consumption (Max TDP)
Memory BandwidthAs far as performance goes, the Radeon R9 295X2 should in theory be a lot superior to the GeForce GTX Titan X in general. (explain)
Texel RateThe Radeon R9 295X2 should be a lot (more or less 87%) more effective at texture filtering than the GeForce GTX Titan X. (explain)
Pixel RateThe Radeon R9 295X2 should be much (about 36%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX Titan X, and also should be able to handle higher screen resolutions without losing too much performance. (explain)
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit. One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of. Price Comparison
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though. Specifications
Display Specifications
Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions. Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the graphics card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second. Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel output rate is also dependant on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.
Display Prices
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
4 Responses to “GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2”It's funny that nVidia even tries to sell the Titan X, since the Z is upcoming and the R9 295X2 is way better than anything nVidia has made (and easily $450 cheaper)
Thank you finally someone with some sense!
Two great cards. Make no mistake.
I bought a 295X2 a month ago and the performance / price point is absolutely astonishing. I'm absolutely aware that nVidia's Titan X is a faster 'single core' performer, but every AAA game that I've played so far has run like a banshee without any issues. The exception is Titanfall, but that game is so bad it's hardly an issue.
Battlefield 4 and Shadow of Mordore are just insane for example. The only thing that might usurp it is the forthcoming 390X, but I can't see it happening, hence I made the purchase!
jajajaj
donde estan los de Nvidia?