Submit Benchmarks!

Submit SSD Benchmark
Submit GPU Benchmark

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2

Intro

The GeForce GTX Titan X has clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1750 MHz on the 12288 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 3072 SPUs along with 192 Texture Address Units and 96 ROPs.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R9 295X2, which has clock speeds of 1018 MHz on the GPU, and 1250 MHz on the 4096 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 2816 SPUs along with 176 Texture Address Units and 64 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Benchmarks

These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score

Radeon R9 295X2 21205 points
GeForce GTX Titan X 17879 points
Difference: 3326 (19%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX Titan X 250 Watts
Radeon R9 295X2 500 Watts
Difference: 250 Watts (100%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 295X2 should theoretically be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GTX Titan X in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 640000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 336000 MB/sec
Difference: 304000 (90%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 295X2 should be quite a bit (more or less 87%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX Titan X. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 358336 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 192000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 166336 (87%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R9 295X2 should be a lot (about 36%) faster with regards to full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce GTX Titan X, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R9 295X2 130304 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX Titan X 96000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 34304 (36%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

One or more cards in this comparison are multi-core. This means that their bandwidth, texel and pixel rates are theoretically doubled - this does not mean the card will actually perform twice as fast, but only that it should in theory be able to. Actual game benchmarks will give a more accurate idea of what it's capable of.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX Titan X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 295X2

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX Titan X Radeon R9 295X2
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year March 2015 April 2014
Code Name GM200 Vesuvius
Memory 12288 MB 4096 MB (x2)
Core Speed 1000 MHz 1018 MHz (x2)
Memory Speed 7000 MHz 5000 MHz (x2)
Power (Max TDP) 250 watts 500 watts
Bandwidth 336000 MB/sec 640000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 192000 Mtexels/sec 358336 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 96000 Mpixels/sec 130304 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 3072 2816 (x2)
Texture Mapping Units 192 176 (x2)
Render Output Units 96 64 (x2)
Bus Type GDDR5 GDDR5
Bus Width 384-bit 512-bit (x2)
Fab Process 28 nm 28 nm
Transistors 8000 million 6200 million
Bus PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 12.0 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.5 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR memory, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card could possibly record to the local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on many other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX Titan X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 295X2

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

4 Responses to “GeForce GTX Titan X vs Radeon R9 295X2”
FuzzleSnuz says:

It's funny that nVidia even tries to sell the Titan X, since the Z is upcoming and the R9 295X2 is way better than anything nVidia has made (and easily $450 cheaper)

The Gambit1337 says:

Thank you finally someone with some sense!

Ian Witts says:

Two great cards. Make no mistake.

I bought a 295X2 a month ago and the performance / price point is absolutely astonishing. I'm absolutely aware that nVidia's Titan X is a faster 'single core' performer, but every AAA game that I've played so far has run like a banshee without any issues. The exception is Titanfall, but that game is so bad it's hardly an issue.

Battlefield 4 and Shadow of Mordore are just insane for example. The only thing that might usurp it is the forthcoming 390X, but I can't see it happening, hence I made the purchase!

Medwar says:

jajajaj
donde estan los de Nvidia?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti-Spam by WP-SpamShield