Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 uses a 65 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM is set to run at a speed of 999 MHz on this specific model. It features 216 SPUs along with 72 TAUs and 28 ROPs.

Compare all that to the GeForce GTX 750 Ti, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has clocked the core speed at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a speed of 1350 MHz on this model. It features 640 SPUs as well as 40 TAUs and 16 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 60 Watts
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Difference: 142 Watts (237%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 will be 30% quicker than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti in general, because of its greater data rate. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 86400 MB/sec
Difference: 25488 (30%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a little bit (approximately 2%) more effective at AF than the GeForce GTX 750 Ti. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 40800 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 672 (2%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a better choice, though not by far. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 Ti 16320 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 192 (1%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year September 16, 2008 February 2014
Code Name G200 GM107
Memory 896 MB 2048 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 1020 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 5400 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 60 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 86400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 40800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 16320 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 640
Texture Mapping Units 72 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 1870 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.4

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the maximum amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transported past the external memory interface within a second. It is calculated by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. In the case of DDR RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This number is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The higher the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The figure is worked out by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel rate also depends on many other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

One Response to “GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti”
fhj52 says:

GTX260-216 *typically* has core speed of 630MHz and memory speed of 2126MHz. The figures above are *stock* speeds for the GTX260.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield