Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 9800 GT 512MB vs GeForce GTX 750

Intro

The GeForce 9800 GT 512MB has core speeds of 600 MHz on the GPU, and 900 MHz on the 512 MB of GDDR3 memory. It features 112 SPUs along with 56 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare all of that to the GeForce GTX 750, which makes use of a 28 nm design. nVidia has set the core speed at 1020 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a frequency of 1250 MHz on this specific card. It features 512 SPUs as well as 32 TAUs and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 750 55 Watts
GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 105 Watts
Difference: 50 Watts (91%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 750 should in theory be quite a bit better than the GeForce 9800 GT 512MB in general. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 80000 MB/sec
GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 57600 MB/sec
Difference: 22400 (39%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce 9800 GT 512MB will be just a bit (more or less 3%) better at anisotropic filtering than the GeForce GTX 750. (explain)

GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 33600 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 750 32640 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 960 (3%)

Pixel Rate

If running with a high screen resolution is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 750 is a better choice, and very much so. (explain)

GeForce GTX 750 16320 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 9600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 6720 (70%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

GeForce 9800 GT 512MB

Amazon.com

GeForce GTX 750

Amazon.com

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Model GeForce 9800 GT 512MB GeForce GTX 750
Manufacturer nVidia nVidia
Year July 2008 February 2014
Code Name G92a/b GM107
Fab Process 65/55 nm 28 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 600 MHz 1020 MHz
Shader Speed 1500 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 900 MHz (1800 MHz effective) 1250 MHz (5000 MHz effective)
Unified Shaders 112 512
Texture Mapping Units 56 32
Render Output Units 16 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 256-bit 128-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.0
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.4
Power (Max TDP) 105 watts 55 watts
Shader Model 4.0 5.0
Bandwidth 57600 MB/sec 80000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 33600 Mtexels/sec 32640 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 9600 Mpixels/sec 16320 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in megabytes per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface in a second. The number is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR type RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the video card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the number of ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate also depends on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree