Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm vs Radeon HD 4790

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm features a GPU core clock speed of 576 MHz, and the 896 MB of GDDR3 memory runs at 999 MHz through a 448-bit bus. It also features 216 SPUs, 72 TAUs, and 28 Raster Operation Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 4790, which has GPU clock speed of 600 MHz, and 512 MB of GDDR5 memory running at 800 MHz through a 256-bit bus. It also features 640(128x5) SPUs, 32 Texture Address Units, and 16 ROPs.

(No game benchmarks for this combination yet.)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm will be 9% quicker than the Radeon HD 4790 in general, because of its higher bandwidth. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 111888 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4790 102400 MB/sec
Difference: 9488 (9%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm will be a lot (about 116%) better at AF than the Radeon HD 4790. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 41472 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4790 19200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 22272 (116%)

Pixel Rate

The GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm will be quite a bit (approximately 68%) more effective at AA than the Radeon HD 4790, and also capable of handling higher screen resolutions while still performing well. (explain)

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm 16128 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4790 9600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 6528 (68%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 4790

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 216SP 55 nm Radeon HD 4790
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year December 22, 2008 2009
Code Name G200b RV790
Fab Process 55 nm 55 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory 896 MB 512 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 600 MHz
Shader Speed 1242 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 999 MHz 800 MHz
Unified Shaders 216 640(128x5)
Texture Mapping Units 72 32
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.0
Power (Max TDP) 171 watts (N/A) watts
Shader Model 4.0 4.1
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 102400 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 19200 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 9600 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface in a second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, the result should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that are processed per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total number of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels the graphics card can possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the card's clock speed. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the max fill rate.

Facebook Activity

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree