Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Radeon R9 280X

Intro

The GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 makes use of a 65 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 576 MHz. The GDDR3 memory works at a speed of 999 MHz on this model. It features 216 SPUs as well as 72 Texture Address Units and 28 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R9 280X, which comes with core clock speeds of 850 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 memory. It features 2048 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 202 Watts
Radeon R9 280X 250 Watts
Difference: 48 Watts (24%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the Radeon R9 280X should in theory be quite a bit superior to the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 in general. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 288000 MB/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 111888 MB/sec
Difference: 176112 (157%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R9 280X will be a lot (about 162%) better at AF than the GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 108800 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 41472 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 67328 (162%)

Pixel Rate

If using a high resolution is important to you, then the Radeon R9 280X is the winner, and very much so. (explain)

Radeon R9 280X 27200 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 16128 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 11072 (69%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Radeon R9 280X
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 16, 2008 October 2013
Code Name G200 Tahiti XTL
Memory 896 MB 3072 MB
Core Speed 576 MHz 850 MHz
Memory Speed 1998 MHz 6000 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 202 watts 250 watts
Bandwidth 111888 MB/sec 288000 MB/sec
Texel Rate 41472 Mtexels/sec 108800 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 16128 Mpixels/sec 27200 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 216 2048
Texture Mapping Units 72 128
Render Output Units 28 32
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 384-bit
Fab Process 65 nm 28 nm
Transistors 1400 million 4313 million
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved over the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory clock speed. In the case of DDR type RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This number is worked out by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the video card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum number of pixels that the graphics card can possibly record to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is calculated by multiplying the number of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the ability to reach the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R9 280X

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield