 |
 |
Radeon HD 7970 vs Radeon R9 280X
Intro
The Radeon HD 7970 has clock speeds of 925 MHz on the GPU, and 1375 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 2048 SPUs as well as 128 Texture Address Units and 32 Rasterization Operator Units.Compare all of that to the Radeon R9 280X, which has clock speeds of 850 MHz on the GPU, and 1500 MHz on the 3072 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 2048 SPUs along with 128 Texture Address Units and 32 ROPs.
Benchmarks
These are real-world performance benchmarks that were submitted by Hardware Compare users. The scores seen here are the average of all benchmarks submitted for each respective test and hardware.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics Score
| Radeon R9 280X |
|
8886 points |
| Radeon HD 7970 |
|
8225 points |
|
|
Ethereum Mining Hash Rate
| Radeon HD 7970 |
|
21 Mh/s |
| Radeon R9 280X |
|
21 Mh/s |
|
|
Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks
Both cards have the same power consumption.Memory Bandwidth
The Radeon R9 280X should in theory perform a bit faster than the Radeon HD 7970 in general. (explain)
| Radeon R9 280X |
|
288000 MB/sec |
| Radeon HD 7970 |
|
264000 MB/sec |
|
|
Texel Rate
The Radeon HD 7970 should be just a bit (about 9%) more effective at anisotropic filtering than the Radeon R9 280X. (explain)| Radeon HD 7970 |
|
118400 Mtexels/sec |
| Radeon R9 280X |
|
108800 Mtexels/sec |
|
|
Pixel Rate
If using a high screen resolution is important to you, then the Radeon HD 7970 is superior to the Radeon R9 280X, but not by far. (explain)| Radeon HD 7970 |
|
29600 Mpixels/sec |
| Radeon R9 280X |
|
27200 Mpixels/sec |
|
|
Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.
Price Comparison
Radeon HD 7970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 280XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
Specifications
| Model | Radeon HD 7970 | Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AMD | AMD |
| Year | January 2012 | October 2013 |
| Code Name | Tahiti XT | Tahiti XTL |
| Memory | 3072 MB | 3072 MB |
| Core Speed | 925 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Memory Speed | 5500 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Power (Max TDP) | 250 watts | 250 watts |
| Bandwidth | 264000 MB/sec | 288000 MB/sec |
| Texel Rate | 118400 Mtexels/sec | 108800 Mtexels/sec |
| Pixel Rate | 29600 Mpixels/sec | 27200 Mpixels/sec |
| Unified Shaders | 2048 | 2048 |
| Texture Mapping Units | 128 | 128 |
| Render Output Units | 32 | 32 |
| Bus Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistors | 4313 million | 4313 million |
| Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| DirectX Version | DirectX 11.1 | DirectX 11.2 |
| OpenGL Version | OpenGL 4.2 | OpenGL 4.3 |
Memory Bandwidth: Bandwidth is the max amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be moved past the external memory interface in one second. It is worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by the speed of its memory. In the case of DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The better the bandwidth is, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and high resolutions.
Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum amount of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels processed in a second.
Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip could possibly write to its local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. Pixel rate is worked out by multiplying the amount of colour ROPs by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the ability to get to the maximum fill rate.
Radeon HD 7970Amazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Radeon R9 280XAmazon.com
Check prices at:
|
Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.
|
Comments
15 Responses to “Radeon HD 7970 vs Radeon R9 280X”That's interesting. If 280x more slowly than 7970, why is it called better than 7970 ghz edition ?
I hope that you know Hardware comparison is wrong ah?
This is all hypothetical since it's all specs and not actual benchmarks. Honestly the 7970 GHz and most of the 280x models are exactly the same in performance.
Not exactly ... the 7970 GHz is a little bit faster, but the r9 280's price is much lower.
these stats are wrong... the base clock of the 280x is like a power saving mode, not to be used in gaming. the 280x is, when being used on the gaming clock speeds better in every way than a HD7970.
of course its only a bit better because it is just a HD7970 with clock speeds increased but thats beside the point.
amd price goughing, thats really nice
7970 practically the same hardware with a 280x
consumers are so stupid, i expected better from computer nerds but im wrong
even with nvidia people have been taking it in the ass ever since
go amd milk everybody's tits, thats the way its been done, learn from your arch nemesis
The only diference between R9 280X and HD 7970 is the package.
I do want to point out the clock speed on here are wrong, by quite a lot and this website doesn't include the 7970 ghz edition.
The normal clock speeds of a r9 280x are 1100 (1150 with boost) core and 1600 (6400 effective) memory speed.
Well, many sites have done a comprehensive, side-by-side comparison test on these two cards. It's no secret they have the same gpu architecture - with the 280x being a little better in power efficiency under full load. The 280x is simply a rebranded (and supposedly reworked) Tahiti core. If you've got the 7970, you can also xf it with a 280x. If you're looking to upgrade from lesser cards, try looking around for a cheaper, 2nd hand 7970, as it slightly outperforms the 280x in most 3D gaming scenarios.
7950 will also crossfire with the 280x. Just as the 7970 and 7950 will crossfire. Work's very well indeed.
ya pero no sale la MSI Radeon R9 280X Gaming ((6GB)) GDDR5
la comparacion cambiaria creo yo aun que no demasiado pero si se notaria sobretodo en los filtros no?
sooo much wrong knowings about this subject.... its simple, the amd HD 7970 is older, the r9 280x is newer. the r9 280x is just an amd hd 7970, but its newer so its slightly faster. same hardware, same chip ( tahiti ) same memory. one thing is wrong here, i have the r9 280x vapor-x and it doesnt has 850mhz, it has 1050 mhz at default clock speed.... so yea, the r9 280x is better but depends on which one you buy! the msi one or the vapor-x? there's a huge different.
better said: R9 280x is better in every single way of use compared to the HD series ( not talking about the dual-core gpu's )
this is not correct!!! look on GPU BOSS,this website is bullshitt!!! R9 280X is better than 7970
the only difference is
7970 pcie 2.1
r9 280x pcie 3.0
http://products.amd.com/en-us/GraphicCardResult.aspx
hehe i dont care