Join Us On Facebook

Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GTX 275 vs Radeon HD 4890 1GB

Intro

The GeForce GTX 275 makes use of a 55 nm design. nVidia has set the core frequency at 633 MHz. The GDDR3 RAM works at a speed of 1134 MHz on this specific card. It features 240 SPUs along with 80 Texture Address Units and 28 Rasterization Operator Units.

Compare that to the Radeon HD 4890 1GB, which makes use of a 55 nm design. ATi has clocked the core speed at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory runs at a speed of 975 MHz on this particular card. It features 800(160x5) SPUs along with 40 Texture Address Units and 16 Rasterization Operator Units.

Avatar

Settings: Ultra High Quality
AA: 8x
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 38 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 36 FPS
Difference: 2 FPS (6%)

Battlefield Bad Company 2

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 39 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 36 FPS
Difference: 3 FPS (8%)

Crysis Warhead

Settings: Gamer Setting
AA: none
AF: none
Resolution: 1680 x 1050
Test Machine: Intel Core i7 920 ,Vista Ultimate x64 SP1 , 3x2GB Ram (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 45 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 45 FPS
Difference: 0 FPS (0%)

F.E.A.R. 2

Settings: Maximum Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Unknown (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 88 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 73 FPS
Difference: 15 FPS (21%)

Fallout 3

Settings: Very High Quality
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 63 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 61 FPS
Difference: 2 FPS (3%)

Fallout 3

Settings: Very High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1680x1050
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Charts Test Rig (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 86 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 80 FPS
Difference: 6 FPS (8%)

Far Cry 2

Settings: Very High Qualty
AA: none
AF: none
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Intel Core i7-920,3 x 2 GB Ram,Windows Vista Ultimate 32 Bit SP1 (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 69 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 64 FPS
Difference: 5 FPS (8%)

Left4Dead

Settings: Very High Quality
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 80 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 74 FPS
Difference: 6 FPS (8%)

Left4Dead

Settings: Very High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Charts Test Rig (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 90 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 87 FPS
Difference: 3 FPS (3%)

Left4Dead 2

Settings: Very High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 88 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 85 FPS
Difference: 3 FPS (4%)

Mass Effect 2

Settings: Maximum Quality
AA: none
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 108 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 107 FPS
Difference: 1 FPS (1%)

Supreme Commander 2

Settings: High
AA: 8x
AF: 16x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 64 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 38 FPS
Difference: 26 FPS (68%)

Tom Clancy's Endwar

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1920x1200
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Test Machine (Source)
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 30 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 28 FPS
Difference: 2 FPS (7%)

Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X

Settings: High Quality
AA: 4x
AF: 8x
Resolution: 1680x1050
Test Machine: Tom's Hardware Charts Test Rig (Source)
GeForce GTX 275 67 FPS
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 41 FPS
Difference: 26 FPS (63%)

Radeon HD 4890 1GB wins

(Based entirely on the benchmarks listed above)

When combining all game benchmark scores on this page together, the Radeon HD 4890 1GB wins overall, by 18 FPS. Please note that we do not have the results of every benchmark ever done for these cards, so the results may differ wildly in different games.

Radeon HD 4890 1GB 914 FPS
GeForce GTX 275 896 FPS
Difference: 18 FPS (2%)

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

Radeon HD 4890 1GB 190 Watts
GeForce GTX 275 219 Watts
Difference: 29 Watts (15%)

Memory Bandwidth

Performance-wise, the GeForce GTX 275 should theoretically be a bit better than the Radeon HD 4890 1GB overall. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 127008 MB/sec
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 124800 MB/sec
Difference: 2208 (2%)

Texel Rate

The GeForce GTX 275 should be much (more or less 27%) better at AF than the Radeon HD 4890 1GB. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 50640 Mtexels/sec
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 40000 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 10640 (27%)

Pixel Rate

If using high levels of AA is important to you, then the GeForce GTX 275 is superior to the Radeon HD 4890 1GB, though only just barely. (explain)

GeForce GTX 275 17724 Mpixels/sec
Radeon HD 4890 1GB 16000 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 1724 (11%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords, and might not be the exact same card listed on this page. We have no control over the accuracy of their search results.

GeForce GTX 275

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Radeon HD 4890 1GB

Amazon.com

Other US-based stores

Amazon.co.uk

Amazon.de

Amazon.fr

Specifications

Model GeForce GTX 275 Radeon HD 4890 1GB
Manufacturer nVidia ATi
Year April 9, 2009 Apr 2, 2009
Code Name G200b RV790 XT
Fab Process 55 nm 55 nm
Bus PCIe x16 2.0 PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory 896 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 633 MHz 1000 MHz
Shader Speed 1404 MHz (N/A) MHz
Memory Speed 1134 MHz 975 MHz
Unified Shaders 240 800(160x5)
Texture Mapping Units 80 40
Render Output Units 28 16
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 448-bit 256-bit
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 10.1
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.1 OpenGL 3.0
Power (Max TDP) 219 watts 190 watts
Shader Model 4.0 4.1
Bandwidth 127008 MB/sec 124800 MB/sec
Texel Rate 50640 Mtexels/sec 40000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 17724 Mpixels/sec 16000 Mpixels/sec

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (in units of megabytes per second) that can be transported across the external memory interface in one second. It's worked out by multiplying the card's bus width by its memory clock speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 again. If DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This figure is calculated by multiplying the total texture units of the card by the core clock speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the video card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels in a second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics chip can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - aka Render Output Units) are responsible for filling the screen with pixels (the image). The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Facebook Activity

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published.


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree