Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce 8400 GS 512MB comes with a GPU core clock speed of 650 MHz, and the 512 MB of DDR2 RAM is set to run at 400 MHz through a 64-bit bus. It also features 16 Stream Processors, 8 TAUs, and 4 Raster Operation Units.

Compare those specifications to the Radeon R7 250, which has a GPU core clock speed of 1000 MHz, and 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory set to run at 1150 MHz through a 128-bit bus. It also is made up of 384 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 40 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 25 Watts (63%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R7 250 should be 1050% quicker than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB overall, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 6400 MB/sec
Difference: 67200 (1050%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 should be quite a bit (about 362%) more effective at AF than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 5200 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 18800 (362%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 should be much (approximately 208%) better at full screen anti-aliasing than the GeForce 8400 GS 512MB, and will be capable of handling higher screen resolutions more effectively. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce 8400 GS 512MB 2600 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5400 (208%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce 8400 GS 512MB Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year June 2007 October 2013
Code Name G86 Oland XT
Memory 512 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 650 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 800 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 40 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 6400 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5200 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2600 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 16 384
Texture Mapping Units 8 24
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type DDR2 GDDR5
Bus Width 64-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 80 nm 28 nm
Transistors 210 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16, PCI PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.0 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (counted in MB per second) that can be transferred across the external memory interface in a second. It is calculated by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If the card has DDR type RAM, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by 4 instead. The higher the bandwidth is, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and high resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be processed per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total amount of texture units by the core speed of the chip. The higher this number, the better the card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in one second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the amount of Raster Operations Pipelines by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - also called Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate also depends on lots of other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth of the card - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce 8400 GS 512MB

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield