Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 320 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GT 320 features a core clock frequency of 540 MHz and a GDDR3 memory speed of 790 MHz. It also uses a 128-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It is comprised of 72 SPUs, 24 Texture Address Units, and 8 Raster Operation Units.

Compare that to the Radeon R7 250, which features clock speeds of 1000 MHz on the GPU, and 1150 MHz on the 1024 MB of GDDR5 RAM. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 320 43 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 22 Watts (51%)

Memory Bandwidth

Theoretically speaking, the Radeon R7 250 will be 191% faster than the GeForce GT 320 in general, due to its greater data rate. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GT 320 25280 MB/sec
Difference: 48320 (191%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 should be much (approximately 85%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 320. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 320 12960 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 11040 (85%)

Pixel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 should be quite a bit (approximately 85%) more effective at FSAA than the GeForce GT 320, and will be able to handle higher screen resolutions better. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 320 4320 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 3680 (85%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 320 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year February 2010 October 2013
Code Name GT215 Oland XT
Memory 1024 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 540 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1580 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 43 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 25280 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 12960 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 4320 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 72 384
Texture Mapping Units 24 24
Render Output Units 8 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 727 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 10.1 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 3.3 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of information (measured in megabytes per second) that can be transferred past the external memory interface in a second. It is worked out by multiplying the bus width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR memory, it must be multiplied by 2 once again. If it uses DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The better the card's memory bandwidth, the faster the card will be in general. It especially helps with AA, High Dynamic Range and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that can be applied in one second. This is worked out by multiplying the total number of texture units of the card by the core speed of the chip. The better the texel rate, the better the graphics card will be at handling texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied in one second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels the graphics card can possibly record to its local memory in a second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is worked out by multiplying the amount of Render Output Units by the clock speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, especially the memory bandwidth - the lower the memory bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the max fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 320

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield