Compare any two graphics cards:
VS

GeForce GT 420 vs Radeon R7 250

Intro

The GeForce GT 420 features a clock frequency of 700 MHz and a GDDR3 memory frequency of 900 MHz. It also features a 128-bit bus, and uses a 40 nm design. It features 48 SPUs, 8 TAUs, and 4 ROPs.

Compare those specs to the Radeon R7 250, which uses a 28 nm design. AMD has set the core frequency at 1000 MHz. The GDDR5 memory is set to run at a frequency of 1150 MHz on this model. It features 384 SPUs as well as 24 Texture Address Units and 8 ROPs.

Display Graphs

Hide Graphs

Power Usage and Theoretical Benchmarks

Power Consumption (Max TDP)

GeForce GT 420 50 Watts
Radeon R7 250 65 Watts
Difference: 15 Watts (30%)

Memory Bandwidth

In theory, the Radeon R7 250 should be 156% faster than the GeForce GT 420 in general, due to its higher bandwidth. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 73600 MB/sec
GeForce GT 420 28800 MB/sec
Difference: 44800 (156%)

Texel Rate

The Radeon R7 250 will be much (approximately 329%) better at texture filtering than the GeForce GT 420. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 24000 Mtexels/sec
GeForce GT 420 5600 Mtexels/sec
Difference: 18400 (329%)

Pixel Rate

If running with high levels of AA is important to you, then the Radeon R7 250 is a better choice, by far. (explain)

Radeon R7 250 8000 Mpixels/sec
GeForce GT 420 2800 Mpixels/sec
Difference: 5200 (186%)

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Price Comparison

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 420

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Specifications

Display Specifications

Hide Specifications

Model GeForce GT 420 Radeon R7 250
Manufacturer nVidia AMD
Year September 2010 October 2013
Code Name GF108 Oland XT
Memory 2048 MB 1024 MB
Core Speed 700 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory Speed 1800 MHz 4600 MHz
Power (Max TDP) 50 watts 65 watts
Bandwidth 28800 MB/sec 73600 MB/sec
Texel Rate 5600 Mtexels/sec 24000 Mtexels/sec
Pixel Rate 2800 Mpixels/sec 8000 Mpixels/sec
Unified Shaders 48 384
Texture Mapping Units 8 24
Render Output Units 4 8
Bus Type GDDR3 GDDR5
Bus Width 128-bit 128-bit
Fab Process 40 nm 28 nm
Transistors 585 million 1040 million
Bus PCIe x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
DirectX Version DirectX 11 DirectX 11.2
OpenGL Version OpenGL 4.1 OpenGL 4.3

Memory Bandwidth: Memory bandwidth is the largest amount of data (counted in MB per second) that can be moved across the external memory interface within a second. It is worked out by multiplying the interface width by its memory speed. If it uses DDR RAM, it should be multiplied by 2 once again. If DDR5, multiply by ANOTHER 2x. The higher the memory bandwidth, the better the card will be in general. It especially helps with anti-aliasing, HDR and higher screen resolutions.

Texel Rate: Texel rate is the maximum number of texture map elements (texels) that are applied per second. This is worked out by multiplying the total texture units by the core speed of the chip. The better this number, the better the card will be at texture filtering (anisotropic filtering - AF). It is measured in millions of texels applied per second.

Pixel Rate: Pixel rate is the maximum amount of pixels that the graphics card could possibly write to the local memory per second - measured in millions of pixels per second. The number is calculated by multiplying the number of Render Output Units by the the core speed of the card. ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines - sometimes also referred to as Render Output Units) are responsible for drawing the pixels (image) on the screen. The actual pixel fill rate is also dependant on quite a few other factors, most notably the memory bandwidth - the lower the bandwidth is, the lower the potential to get to the maximum fill rate.

Display Prices

Hide Prices

GeForce GT 420

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Radeon R7 250

Amazon.com

Check prices at:

Please note that the price comparisons are based on search keywords - sometimes it might show cards with very similar names that are not exactly the same as the one chosen in the comparison. We do try to filter out the wrong results as best we can, though.

Comments

Be the first to leave a comment!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


*

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield